# Easy peasy STATA-like marginal effects with R

**Econometrics and Free Software**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Model interpretation is essential in the social sciences. If one wants to know the effect of variable `x`

on the dependent variable `y`

, marginal effects are an easy way to get the answer. STATA includes a `margins`

command that has been ported to R by Thomas J. Leeper of the London School of Economics and Political Science. You can find the source code of the package on github. In this short blog post, I demo some of the functionality of `margins`

.

First, let’s load some packages:

library(ggplot2) library(tibble) library(broom) library(margins) library(Ecdat)

As an example, we are going to use the `Participation`

data from the `Ecdat`

package:

data(Participation)

?Participation

Labor Force Participation Description a cross-section number of observations : 872 observation : individuals country : Switzerland Usage data(Participation) Format A dataframe containing : lfp labour force participation ? lnnlinc the log of nonlabour income age age in years divided by 10 educ years of formal education nyc the number of young children (younger than 7) noc number of older children foreign foreigner ? Source Gerfin, Michael (1996) “Parametric and semiparametric estimation of the binary response”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(3), 321-340. References Davidson, R. and James G. MacKinnon (2004) Econometric Theory and Methods, New York, Oxford University Press, http://www.econ.queensu.ca/ETM/, chapter 11. Journal of Applied Econometrics data archive : http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/jae/.

The variable of interest is `lfp`

: whether the individual participates in the labour force or not. To know which variables are relevant in the decision to participate in the labour force, one could estimate a logit model, using `glm()`

.

logit_participation = glm(lfp ~ ., data = Participation, family = "binomial")

Now that we ran the regression, we can take a look at the results. I like to use `broom::tidy()`

to look at the results of regressions, as `tidy()`

returns a nice `data.frame`

, but you could use `summary()`

if you’re only interested in reading the output:

tidy(logit_participation)

## term estimate std.error statistic p.value ## 1 (Intercept) 10.37434616 2.16685216 4.7877499 1.686617e-06 ## 2 lnnlinc -0.81504064 0.20550116 -3.9661122 7.305449e-05 ## 3 age -0.51032975 0.09051783 -5.6378920 1.721444e-08 ## 4 educ 0.03172803 0.02903580 1.0927211 2.745163e-01 ## 5 nyc -1.33072362 0.18017027 -7.3859224 1.514000e-13 ## 6 noc -0.02198573 0.07376636 -0.2980454 7.656685e-01 ## 7 foreignyes 1.31040497 0.19975784 6.5599678 5.381941e-11

From the results above, one can only interpret the sign of the coefficients. To know how much a variable influences the labour force participation, one has to use `margins()`

:

effects_logit_participation = margins(logit_participation)

## Warning in warn_for_weights(model): 'weights' used in model estimation are ## currently ignored!

print(effects_logit_participation)

## Average marginal effects

## glm(formula = lfp ~ ., family = "binomial", data = Participation)

## lnnlinc age educ nyc noc foreignyes ## -0.1699 -0.1064 0.006616 -0.2775 -0.004584 0.2834

Using `summary()`

on the object returned by `margins()`

provides more details:

summary(effects_logit_participation)

## factor AME SE z p lower upper ## age -0.1064 0.0176 -6.0494 0.0000 -0.1409 -0.0719 ## educ 0.0066 0.0060 1.0955 0.2733 -0.0052 0.0185 ## foreignyes 0.2834 0.0399 7.1102 0.0000 0.2053 0.3615 ## lnnlinc -0.1699 0.0415 -4.0994 0.0000 -0.2512 -0.0887 ## noc -0.0046 0.0154 -0.2981 0.7656 -0.0347 0.0256 ## nyc -0.2775 0.0333 -8.3433 0.0000 -0.3426 -0.2123

And it is also possible to plot the effects with base graphics:

plot(effects_logit_participation)

This uses the basic R plotting capabilities, which is useful because it is a simple call to the function `plot()`

but if you’ve been using `ggplot2`

and want this graph to have the same look as the others made with `ggplot2`

you first need to save the summary in a variable. Let’s overwrite this `effects_logit_participation`

variable with its summary:

effects_logit_participation = summary(effects_logit_participation)

And now it is possible to use `ggplot2`

to create the same plot:

ggplot(data = effects_logit_participation) + geom_point(aes(factor, AME)) + geom_errorbar(aes(x = factor, ymin = lower, ymax = upper)) + geom_hline(yintercept = 0) + theme_minimal() + theme(axis.text.x = element_text(angle = 45))

So an infinitesimal increase, in say, non-labour income (`lnnlinc`

) of 0.001 is associated with a decrease of the probability of labour force participation by 0.001*17 percentage points.

You can also extract the marginal effects of a single variable, with `dydx()`

:

head(dydx(Participation, logit_participation, "lnnlinc"))

## dydx_lnnlinc ## 1 -0.15667764 ## 2 -0.20014487 ## 3 -0.18495109 ## 4 -0.05377262 ## 5 -0.18710476 ## 6 -0.19586986

Which makes it possible to extract the effects for a list of individuals that you can create yourself:

my_subjects = tribble( ~lfp, ~lnnlinc, ~age, ~educ, ~nyc, ~noc, ~foreign, "yes", 10.780, 7.0, 4, 1, 1, "yes", "no", 1.30, 9.0, 1, 4, 1, "yes" ) dydx(my_subjects, logit_participation, "lnnlinc")

## dydx_lnnlinc ## 1 -0.09228119 ## 2 -0.17953451

I used the `tribble()`

function from the `tibble`

package to create this test data set, row by row. Then, using `dydx()`

, I get the marginal effect of variable `lnnlinc`

for these two individuals. No doubt that this package will be a huge help convincing more social scientists to try out R and make a potential transition from STATA easier.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Econometrics and Free Software**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.