**Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

In the previous post (here) discussing forecasts of actuarial quantities, I did not mention much how to forecast the temporal component in the Lee-Carter model. Actually, many things can be done. Consider here some exponential smoothing techniques (see here for more details). For instance, with a simple model, with an additive error, no trend and no seasonal component,

or equivalently

Then , and if we want a confidence interval

> (ETS.ANN=ets(Y,model="ANN"))

ETS(A,N,N)

Call:

ets(y = Y, model = "ANN")

Smoothing parameters:

alpha = 0.7039

Initial states:

l = 75.0358

sigma: 11.4136

AIC AICc BIC

941.0089 941.1339 946.1991

> plot(forecast(ETS.ANN,h=100))

Here, a natural idea will probably be to take into account a *linear trend* on the series, i.e.

where

then the forecast we make is i.e.

It is also possible to ask for an “*optimal*” exponential smoothing model (without any specification)

> ETS

ETS(A,A,N)

Call:

ets(y = Y)

Smoothing parameters:

alpha = 0.6107

beta = 1e-04

Initial states:

l = 74.5622

b = -1.9812

sigma: 11.0094

AIC AICc BIC

937.8695 938.2950 948.2500

> plot(forecast(ETS,h=100))

Another idea can be to consider some autoregressive integrated moving average models (ARIMA), here with a linear trend

For instance, if we want only the integrated component, i.e.

then the code is

> ARIMA010T=Arima(Y,order=c(0,1,0),include.drift=TRUE)

Series: Y

ARIMA(0,1,0) with drift

Call: Arima(x = Y, order = c(0, 1, 0), include.drift = TRUE)

Coefficients:

drift

-2.0337

s.e. 1.1904

sigma^2 estimated as 138.9: log likelihood = -380.8

AIC = 765.6 AICc = 765.73 BIC = 770.77

> plot(forecast(ARIMA010T,h=100))

But note that any kind of ARIMA model can be considered, e.g. integrated with an autoregressive component (here of order 1)

or with also a moving average component (again of order 1)

Actually, note that, once again, we can ask for an automatic selection of the model,

> (autoARIMA=auto.arima(Y,allowdrift=TRUE))

Series: Y

ARIMA(0,1,1) with drift

Call: auto.arima(x = Y, allowdrift = TRUE)

Coefficients:

ma1 drift

-0.3868 -2.0139

s.e. 0.0970 0.6894

sigma^2 estimated as 122.3: log likelihood = -374.65

AIC = 755.29 AICc = 755.55 BIC = 763.05

> plot(forecast(autoARIMA,h=100))

Finally, it is possible to use also also some specific functions of the package, for instance to consider a random walk with a drift,

RWF=rwf(Y,h=100,drift=TRUE)

plot(RWF)

or Holt model (with a trend)

HOLT=holt(Y,h=100,damped=TRUE)

plot(HOLT)

And if all that is not enough, it is also possible to go further by changing the size of the series we use to fit the model. A question that naturally arises is the treatment of wars in our model: shouldn’t we assume that the forecast should be based only on the last 50 years (and exclude wars from our analysis) ? In that case, for instance, the exponential smoothing technique gives

while the ARIMA procedure returns

And finally, with the Holt technique, we have

So, it looks like we have a lot of techniques that can be used to provide a forecast for the temporal component in the Lee-Carter model,

All those estimators can be used to estimate annuities of insurance contracts (as here),

BASEB=BASEB[,1:99]

BASEC=BASEC[,1:99]

AGE=AGE[1:99]

library(gnm)

D=as.vector(BASEB)

E=as.vector(BASEC)

A=rep(AGE,each=length(ANNEE))

Y=rep(ANNEE,length(AGE))

base=data.frame(D,E,A,Y,a=as.factor(A),

y=as.factor(Y))

LC2=gnm(D~a+Mult(a,y),offset=log(E),

family=poisson,data=base)

A=LC2$coefficients[1]+LC2$coefficients[2:99]

B=LC2$coefficients[100:198]

K0=LC2$coefficients[199:297]

Y=as.numeric(K01)

K1=c(K0,forecast(ets(Y),h=120)$mean)

K2=c(K0,forecast(auto.arima(Y,allowdrift=TRUE),h=120)$mean)

K3=c(K0,rwf(Y,h=120,drift=TRUE)$mean)

K4=c(K0,holt(Y,h=120,drift=TRUE)$mean)

K5=c(K0,forecast(ets(Y[50:99]),h=120)$mean)

K6=c(K0,forecast(auto.arima(Y[50:99],allowdrift=TRUE),h=120)$mean)

K7=c(K0,rwf(Y[50:99],h=120,drift=TRUE)$mean)

K8=c(K0,holt(Y[50:99],h=120,drift=TRUE)$mean)

MU=matrix(NA,length(A),length(K1))

MU1=MU2=MU3=MU4=MU5=MU6=MU7=MU8=MU

for(i in 1:length(A)){

for(j in 1:length(K1)){

MU1[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K1[j])

MU2[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K5[j])

MU3[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K3[j])

MU4[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K4[j])

MU5[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K5[j])

MU6[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K6[j])

MU7[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K7[j])

MU8[i,j]=exp(A[i]+B[i]*K8[j])

}}

t=2000

x=40

s=seq(0,98-x-1)

Pxt1=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU1[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt2=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU2[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt3=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU3[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt4=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU4[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt5=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU5[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt6=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU6[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt7=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU7[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

Pxt8=cumprod(exp(-diag(MU8[x+1+s,t+s-1898])))

r=.035

m=70

h=seq(0,21)

V1=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt1[m-x+h]

V2=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt2[m-x+h]

V3=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt3[m-x+h]

V4=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt4[m-x+h]

V5=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt5[m-x+h]

V6=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt6[m-x+h]

V7=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt7[m-x+h]

V8=1/(1+r)^(m-x+h)*Pxt8[m-x+h]

Hence, here the difference is significant,

> M=cbind(V1,V2,V3,V4,V5,V6,V7,V8) > apply(M,2,sum) V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 4.389372 4.632793 4.406465 4.389372 4.632793 4.468934 4.482064 4.632793

or graphically,

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials on topics such as: visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...