Where are the Fat Tails?

June 19, 2012

(This article was first published on Timely Portfolio, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

In Crazy RUT, I started to explore why the moving average strategy has failed for the last 2 decades on the Russell 2000.  I still do not have an answer, but I thought looking at skewness and kurtosis might help explain some of the challenge of beating this index.  I think–but don’t have as much rigid objective evidence as I would like–that moving average systems work best when skew is negative and kurtosis is positive because that implies that the bad stuff happens below the mean when you would be out.

The Russell 2000 has been remarkably tame in terms of skewness and kurtosis even including 2008-2009.

From TimelyPortfolio
From TimelyPortfolio

R code from GIST (do raw for copy/paste):

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Timely Portfolio.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers


Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)