**David Chudzicki's Blog**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

My last post uses random forest proximity to visualize a set of diamond shapes (the random forest is trained to distinguish diamonds from non-diamonds).

This time I looked at the digits data set that Kaggle is using as the basis of a competition for “getting started”. The random forest is trained to classify the digits, and this is an embedding of 1000 digits into 2 dimensions preserving proximities from the random forest as closely as possible:

The colors of the points show the correct label. The larger points are incorrectly classified, and you can see that in general those are ones that the random forest has put in the wrong “region”. I’ve shown some of the digits themselves (instead of colored points) — the red ones are incorrectly classified.

Here’s the same but just for the 7’s:

The random forest has done a reasonable job putting different types of 7’s in different areas, with the most “canonical” 7’s toward the middle.

You can see all of the other digits http://www.learnfromdata.com/media/blog/digits/.

Note that this random forest is different from the one in my last post — here it’s built to classify the digits, not separate digits from non-digits. I wonder what kind of results a random forest to distinguish 7’s from non-7’s would look like?

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**David Chudzicki's Blog**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.