# Permanent Portfolio – Transaction Cost and better Risk Parity

**Systematic Investor » R**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

I want to address comments that were asked in my last post, Permanent Portfolio – Simple Tools, about Permanent Portfolio strategy. Specifically:

- The impact of transaction costs on the perfromance and
- Create a modified version of risk allocation portfolio that distributes weights across 3 asset classes: stocks(SPY), gold(GLD), and treasuries(TLT), and only invests into cash(SHY) to fill the residual portfolio exposure once we scale the SPY/GLD/TLT portfolio to the target volatility

The first point is easy, to incorporate the transaction cost into your back-test just add commission=0.1 parameter to the bt.run.share() function call.For example, to see the dollar allocation strategy perfromance assuming 10c a share commission, use following code:

# original strategy models$dollar = bt.run.share(data, clean.signal=F) # assuming 10c a share commissions models$dollar = bt.run.share(data, commission=0.1, clean.signal=F)

The second point is a bit more work. First, let’s allocate risk across only to 3 asset classes: stocks(SPY), gold(GLD), and treasuries(TLT). Next, let’s scale the SPY/GLD/TLT portfolio to the 7% target volatility. And finally, let’s allocate to cash(SHY) the residual portfolio exposure.

#***************************************************************** # Risk Weighted: allocate only to 3 asset classes: stocks(SPY), gold(GLD), and treasuries(TLT) #****************************************************************** ret.log = bt.apply.matrix(prices, ROC, type='continuous') hist.vol = sqrt(252) * bt.apply.matrix(ret.log, runSD, n = 21) weight.risk = weight.dollar / hist.vol weight.risk$SHY = 0 weight.risk = weight.risk / rowSums(weight.risk) data$weight[] = NA data$weight[period.ends,] = weight.risk[period.ends,] models$risk = bt.run.share(data, commission=commission, clean.signal=F) #***************************************************************** # Risk Weighted + 7% target volatility #****************************************************************** data$weight[] = NA data$weight[period.ends,] = target.vol.strategy(models$risk, weight.risk, 7/100, 21, 100/100)[period.ends,] models$risk.target7 = bt.run.share(data, commission=commission, clean.signal=F) #***************************************************************** # Risk Weighted + 7% target volatility + SHY #****************************************************************** data$weight[] = NA data$weight[period.ends,] = target.vol.strategy(models$risk, weight.risk, 7/100, 21, 100/100)[period.ends,] cash = 1-rowSums(data$weight) data$weight$SHY[period.ends,] = cash[period.ends] models$risk.target7.shy = bt.run.share(data, commission=commission, clean.signal=F)

The modified version of risk allocation portfolio performs well relative to other portfolios even after incorporating the 10c transaction cost.

To view the complete source code for this example, please have a look at the bt.permanent.portfolio3.test() function in bt.test.r at github.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Systematic Investor » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.