Heating costs

December 28, 2011

(This article was first published on factbased, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

In 2010, my heating costs exceeded my advance payments by about 25%. This motivated me to decompose the costs to see what drove the changes. Here is the result:

The numbers refer to Euros. Read von right to left: 2010 was a cold year (+102EUR), but gas consumption in this house was relatively low (–89EUR). Also, running costs and gas price were below previous year’s value (–49EUR). The main driver (+183EUR) for the increased costs was my share on the total costs. In 2009, I had to pay 1.7% of the total costs, which rose to 2.3% in 2010. This means my landlord assumes I used more energy than the other tennants in 2010. I doubt that, and one aspect to support my doubts is that the values of the two heat meters in my living room were nearly at the same value, while I used only one heater.

Thus I believe it was a measurement error. I am not going to complain about this, but will check next measurements very carefully.

Not a direct result of the decomposition, but also interesting is the (temperature adjusted) enery use per square meter, which was in 2010 by about 110 kWh/m2, which is nearly average.

Here’s the R code to produce the chart:

Read more »

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: factbased.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers


Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)