**Xi'an's Og » R**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

**I**n the previous days I have received several emails asking for clarification of the effective sample size derivation in “** Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R**” (Section 4.4, pp. 98-100). Formula (4.3) gives the Monte Carlo estimate of the variance of a self-normalised importance sampling estimator (note the change from the original version in

**! The weight**

*Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R**W*is unnormalised and hence the normalising constant appears in the denominator.)

as

Now, the front term is somehow obvious so let us concentrate on the bracketed part. The empirical variance of the ‘s is

the coefficient is thus estimated by

which leads to the definition of the effective sample size

The confusing part in the current version is whether or not we use normalised W’s and ‘s. I hope this clarifies the issue!

Filed under: Books, R, Statistics Tagged: effective sample size, importance sampling, Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Xi'an's Og » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.