CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

February 13, 2019

(This article was first published on Brian Callander, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

Here are my solutions to question 3.3.2 of Causal Inference in Statistics: a Primer (CISP).

Part a

The following DAG is a possible casual graph representing the situation. We wish to find the causal effect of the plan on weight gain. The weight gain \(W_g\) is defined as a linear function of the initial and final weights. From the graph we see that the plan chosen by the students is a function of their initial weight.

A casual diagram for Lord’s paradox
A casual diagram for Lord’s paradox

Part b

Since initial weight \(W_I\) is a confounder of plan and weight gain, the second statistician is correct to condition on initial weight.

Part c

The causal diagram here is essentially the same as in Simpson’s paradox. The debate is essentially the direction of the arrow between initial weight and plan.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Brian Callander. offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers


Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)