CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

February 13, 2019
By

[This article was first published on Brian Callander, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

Here are my solutions to question 3.3.2 of Causal Inference in Statistics: a Primer (CISP).

Part a

The following DAG is a possible casual graph representing the situation. We wish to find the causal effect of the plan on weight gain. The weight gain \(W_g\) is defined as a linear function of the initial and final weights. From the graph we see that the plan chosen by the students is a function of their initial weight.

A casual diagram for Lord’s paradox
A casual diagram for Lord’s paradox

Part b

Since initial weight \(W_I\) is a confounder of plan and weight gain, the second statistician is correct to condition on initial weight.

Part c

The causal diagram here is essentially the same as in Simpson’s paradox. The debate is essentially the direction of the arrow between initial weight and plan.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Brian Callander.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.



If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers

Sponsors

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)