Our idea was to compare each hand-in to all other hand-ins and see the degree of overlap between them. This was achieved using the ngram r-package to break each hand-in into a list of “phrases” and then to count how many times each phrase appeared across a pair of documents1. Finally, the percent of non-unique phrases was calculated.
Looking for Cheaters
We then ran this algorithm across all 300~ hand-ins, and found that it seems like the
knuckle-headed overheard student estimation of “we all just copied from each other” was an extreme exaggeration. Looking at the distribution of overlap, we can see the vast majority of overlap was quite small (and even this small degree of overlap could be accounted for by the fact the most hand-ins contained the assignment instructions in them):
|File names have been redacted.|
The After Math
Other than the cheating students received a failing grade on their assignments, I think we can say that the war on cheaters has escalated – and we cant wait to see the new methods students will use for cheating next year!
If you also want to find cheaters, you can try cheatR (hosted on GitHub) for yourself by installing it in R and running it locally, by running:
<br /># install.packages("devtools")<br />devtools::install_github("mattansb/cheatR")<br />
or you can try our shiny app!
1 We worked under the assumption that if a phrase’s was found more than once, it was not because it was repeated within the same document, but becuase it apeared in both documents. This might not always be the case, but we found no “false positives” in our usage so far, so this might be a resonable assumption.