Could G-Cloud pricing be simplified?

[This article was first published on R – thinkr, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Background

The Digital Marketplace is helping those transforming public services by making it simpler, clearer and faster for them to buy what they need. G-Cloud focuses on cloud-based services.  Since its launch in 2012, it has evolved through multiple iterations, with the current version being G-Cloud 9.

So, the introduction of a set of categories in G-Cloud 9 provided a natural step forward.  These offered a level of granularity below the three lots of Cloud Hosting, Software and Support. As a result, buyers are able to find and compare groups of suitable products more easily.

Yet there is plenty of opportunity to further simplify the buyer’s task in future G-Cloud iterations. For example, around price comparison.

Opportunity to simplify pricing

To illustrate the point, let’s take just one of the new categories (Security Testing) under Cloud Support. What we find, per the lollipop chart, are 49 distinct pricing approaches adopted across the circa 4,000 services.

Supplier Pricing Approaches on G-Cloud

Let’s dig a little deeper, and take a closer look at the actual prices.

The majority of the Security Testing services adopt a per-person-per-day pricing approach, so we’ll narrow the focus to those. This usefully minimises any variability in what one gets for the price, so we’re closer to an “apple-for-apples” comparison.

Each of these services has a range of rates reflecting the seven levels of the standard rate card. And the chart below reflects the prices at the lower and upper ends.

The blue violin plots, reflect the density of the services at different day-rates, and are augmented by embedded box-and-whisker plots. These show that the rates with the highest density of observations fall at around £400 and £1,200 per-person-per-day.

Supplier Price Ranges on G-Cloud

The takeaway

So, what can we conclude from this?

  • For buyers, future iterations of G-Cloud could constrain the number of available pricing approaches per category. Combined with a tightening of category scope, where appropriate, the Government could thereby simplify buyer comparison.
  • For suppliers, this could also simplify benchmarking and thus enhance price competitiveness.

R tools used

 PackagesFunctions
purrrmap_df; map
rvestread_html; html_nodes; html_text
dplyrselect; arrange; filter; count; mutate; if_else
tidyrgather; separate
stringrstr_replace; str_trim
tibbletibble
lubridatetoday
ggplot2theme_set; geom_violin; geom_boxplot; geom_text
forcatsfct_infreq
ggaltgeom_lollipop
ggthemestheme_
economist

Citations

R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for
statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,
Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The post Could G-Cloud pricing be simplified? appeared first on thinkr.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: R – thinkr.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)