# Simulating queueing systems with ‘simmer’

**R – Enchufa2**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

We are very pleased to announce that a new release of **simmer**, the Discrete-Event Simulator for R, is on CRAN. There are quite a few changes and fixes, with the **support of preemption** as a star new feature. Check out the complete set of release notes here.

Let’s *simmer* for a bit and see how this package can be used to simulate queueing systems in a very straightforward way.

## The M/M/1 system

In Kendall’s notation, an M/M/1 system has exponential arrivals (**M**/M/1), a single server (M/M/**1**) with exponential service time (M/**M**/1) and an inifinite queue (implicit M/M/1/). For instance, people arriving at an ATM at rate , waiting their turn in the street and withdrawing money at rate .

Let us remember the basic parameters of this system:

whenever . If that is not true, it means that the system is unstable: there are more arrivals than the server is capable of handling, and the queue will grow indefinitely.

The simulation of an M/M/1 system is quite simple using `simmer`

. The trajectory-based design, combined with `magrittr`

’s pipe, is very *verbal* and self-explanatory.

library(simmer) set.seed(1234) lambda <- 2 mu <- 4 rho <- lambda/mu # = 2/4 mm1.trajectory <- create_trajectory() %>% seize("resource", amount=1) %>% timeout(function() rexp(1, mu)) %>% release("resource", amount=1) mm1.env <- simmer() %>% add_resource("resource", capacity=1, queue_size=Inf) %>% add_generator("arrival", mm1.trajectory, function() rexp(1, lambda)) %>% run(until=2000)

Our package provides convenience plotting functions to quickly visualise the usage of a resource over time, for instance. Down below, we can see how the simulation converges to the theoretical average number of customers in the system.

library(ggplot2) # Evolution of the average number of customers in the system graph <- plot_resource_usage(mm1.env, "resource", items="system") # Theoretical value mm1.N <- rho/(1-rho) graph + geom_hline(yintercept=mm1.N)

It is possible also to visualise, for instance, the instantaneous usage of individual elements by playing with the parameters`items`

and `steps`

.

plot_resource_usage(mm1.env, "resource", items=c("queue", "server"), steps=TRUE) + xlim(0, 20) + ylim(0, 4)

We may obtain the time spent by each customer in the system and we compare the average with the theoretical expression.

mm1.arrivals <- get_mon_arrivals(mm1.env) mm1.t_system <- mm1.arrivals$end_time - mm1.arrivals$start_time mm1.T <- mm1.N / lambda mm1.T ; mean(mm1.t_system)

## [1] 0.5

## [1] 0.5012594

It seems that it matches the theoretical value pretty well. But of course we are picky, so let’s take a closer look, just to be sure (and to learn more about `simmer`

, why not). Replication can be done with standard R tools:

library(parallel) envs <- mclapply(1:1000, function(i) { simmer() %>% add_resource("resource", capacity=1, queue_size=Inf) %>% add_generator("arrival", mm1.trajectory, function() rexp(1, lambda)) %>% run(1000/lambda) %>% wrap() })

*Et voilà!* Parallelizing has the shortcoming that we lose the underlying C++ objects when each thread finishes, but the `wrap`

function does all the magic for us retrieving the monitored data. Let’s perform a simple test:

library(dplyr) t_system <- get_mon_arrivals(envs) %>% mutate(t_system = end_time - start_time) %>% group_by(replication) %>% summarise(mean = mean(t_system)) t.test(t_system$mean)

## ## One Sample t-test ## ## data: t_system$mean ## t = 348.23, df = 999, p-value < 2.2e-16 ## alternative hypothesis: true mean is not equal to 0 ## 95 percent confidence interval: ## 0.4957328 0.5013516 ## sample estimates: ## mean of x ## 0.4985422

Good news: the simulator works. Finally, an M/M/1 satisfies that the distribution of the time spent in the system is, in turn, an exponential random variable with average .

qqplot(mm1.t_system, rexp(length(mm1.t_system), 1/mm1.T)) abline(0, 1, lty=2, col="red")

## M/M/c/k systems

An M/M/c/k system keeps exponential arrivals and service times, but has more than one server in general and a finite queue, which often is more realistic. For instance, a router may have several processor to handle packets, and the in/out queues are necessarily finite.

This is the simulation of an M/M/2/3 system (2 server, 1 position in queue). Note that the trajectory is identical to the M/M/1 case.

lambda <- 2 mu <- 4 mm23.trajectory <- create_trajectory() %>% seize("server", amount=1) %>% timeout(function() rexp(1, mu)) %>% release("server", amount=1) mm23.env <- simmer() %>% add_resource("server", capacity=2, queue_size=1) %>% add_generator("arrival", mm23.trajectory, function() rexp(1, lambda)) %>% run(until=2000)

In this case, there are rejections when the queue is full.

mm23.arrivals <- get_mon_arrivals(mm23.env) mm23.arrivals %>% summarise(rejection_rate = sum(!finished)/length(finished))

## rejection_rate ## 1 0.02009804

Despite this, the time spent in the system still follows an exponential random variable, as in the M/M/1 case, but the average has dropped.

mm23.t_system <- mm23.arrivals$end_time - mm23.arrivals$start_time # Comparison with M/M/1 times qqplot(mm1.t_system, mm23.t_system) abline(0, 1, lty=2, col="red")

**Contenido extraído de Enchufa2.es**: Simulating queueing systems with ‘simmer’.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**R – Enchufa2**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.