# What your choice of statistics software says about you

**Revolutions**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Sean Taylor, a PhD candidate in Information Systems at NYU’s Stern School of Business, describes the “Statistics Software Signal” and his observation that some software packages are correlated with bad science. While, I don't agree with all of his points (some fine analyses have been done with Stata, for example), I thought this was an interesting take on the R language:

When operating software doesn’t require a lot of training, users of that software are likely to be poorly trained.This is an adverse selection issue. Researchers who care about statistics enough should have gravitated toward R at some point. I also trust results produced using R, not because it is better software, but because it is difficult to learn. The software is not causing you to be a better scientist, but better scientists will be using it.

You can also read his list a of what your choice of statistical software pacakge (SAS, SPSS, Matlab, Julia and more) says about you, at the link below.

decomposition: The Statistics Software Signal

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Revolutions**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.