MAT8886 elliptically contoured distributions
[This article was first published on Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Last week, we’ve introduced the concept of exchangeable variables, i.e. satisfying Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
for any matrix 
, i.e. 
is a permutation matrix: belongs to the orthogonal group, 
, and with elements in 
. It is possible to extend that family, considering all matrices in the orthogonal group, i.e. for all 
. Since orthogonal matrices can be seen as rotation matrices,
it will mean, e.g. that density is invariant by rotations,
So level curves will be circles (in dimension 2), or more generally spheres. This will yield the concept of spherical distribution (or spherically contoured distributions), that will be extended to elliptical distributions (see e.g. Hartman & Wintner (1940), Kelker (1970) or Cambanis, Huang & Simons (1979))
- spherically contoured distributions
has a spherical distribution if its characteristic function can be written
for some function 
. Such a function will be called generator, and we say that 
. Equivalently, has a spherical distribution if 
. A popular example is the Gaussian distribution (centered, with independent margins)
Note that there exist a nice stochastic representation of spherically contoured distribution, 
where 
is a positive random variable, independent of 
, uniformly distributed over the unit sphere of 
, i.e.
This construction can be related to the following decomposition
- from circles to ellipses
and 
for some variance-covariance matrix 
, then
where 
is some square-root of , i.e. 
. Based on that transformation (through that covariance matrix), level curves of the density are non longer circles, be ellipses,
if we change only the variance of the first component (above), while if we change the variance of the second one (below)
If we change only the correlation, the axis of the ellipse are still the first and the second diagonal
while the impact of correlation when X and Y do not have the same variance gives us the following transformations,
- elliptically contoured distributions
if
where is some square-root of , i.e. , and . It characteristic function is then
Further, in that case, 
while 
.
Note that the two most popular elliptical distributions (the Gaussian and Student’s t) can be obtained in R as follows,
> library(mnormt) > x <- seq(-2,4,length=21) > mu <- c(1,3,2) > Sigma <- matrix(c(1,2,0,2,5,0.5,0,0.5,3), 3, 3) > df <- 4 > x=c(0,0);y=c(0,1); z=c(0,2) > dmt(cbind(x,y,z), mu, Sigma,df) [1] 0.006957689 0.020602030 > rmt(n=5, mu, Sigma, df) [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 0.42210352 2.7539135 1.659392 [2,] 1.07968146 -0.1364883 4.851956 [3,] -0.04107115 1.6163407 4.123731 [4,] 0.19784451 2.9329165 1.013374 [5,] 1.13456027 0.4737548 -2.054909
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.