# Machine Learning Ex5.1 – Regularized Linear Regression

**al3xandr3**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Exercise 5.1 Improves the Linear Regression implementation done in Exercise 3 by adding a regularization parameter that reduces the problem of over-fitting.

Over-fitting occurs especially when fitting a high-order polynomial, that we will try to do here.

## Data

Here’s the points we will make a model from:

# linear regression mydata = read.csv("http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?hl=en_GB&hl=en_GB&key=0AnypY27pPCJydGhtbUlZekVUQTc0dm5QaXp1YWpSY3c&output=csv", header = TRUE) # view data plot(mydata)

## Theory

We will fit a 5th order polynomial, so the hypothesis is:

[

h_theta(x) = theta_0 x_0 + theta_1 x_1 + theta_2 x_2^2 + theta_3 x_3^3 + theta_4 x_4^4 + theta_5 x_5^5

]

With (x_0 = 1)

The idea of the regularization is to blunt the fit a bit, i.e. loosen up the tight fit.

For that we define the cost function like so:

[

J(theta) = frac{1}{2m} [sum_{i=1}^m ((h_theta(x^{(i)}) – y^{(i)})^2) + lambda sum_{i=1}^n theta^2]

]

The Lambda is called the regularization parameter.

The regularization parameter added at the end will influence the exact cost values on all parameters.

This will reflect in the search for the (theta) parameters and consequently loosen up the tight fit.

After some math that is not shown here, the **normal equations** with the regularization parameter added, become:

[

theta = (X^T X + lambda begin{bmatrix}

0 & & & \ & 1 & & \ & & … & \ & & & 1

end{bmatrix}

)^{-1} (X^T y)

]

## Implementation

We will try 3 different lambda values to see how it influences the fit. Starting with (lambda=0) where we can see the fit without the regularization parameter.

# setup variables m = length(mydata$x) # samples x = matrix(c(rep(1,m), mydata$x, mydata$x^2, mydata$x^3, mydata$x^4, mydata$x^5), ncol=6) n = ncol(x) # features y = matrix(mydata$y, ncol=1) lambda = c(0,1,10) d = diag(1,n,n) d[1,1] = 0 th = array(0,c(n,length(lambda))) # apply normal equations for each of the lambda's for (i in 1:length(lambda)) { th[,i] = solve(t(x) %*% x + (lambda[i] * d)) %*% (t(x) %*% y) } # plot plot(mydata) # lets create many points nwx = seq(-1, 1, len=50); x = matrix(c(rep(1,length(nwx)), nwx, nwx^2, nwx^3, nwx^4, nwx^5), ncol=6) lines(nwx, x %*% th[,1], col="blue", lty=2) lines(nwx, x %*% th[,2], col="red", lty=2) lines(nwx, x %*% th[,3], col="green3", lty=2) legend("topright", c(expression(lambda==0), expression(lambda==1),expression(lambda==10)), lty=2,col=c("blue", "red", "green3"), bty="n")

With the (lambda=0) the fit is very tight to the original points (the blue line) but as we increase lambda, the model gets less tight(more generalized) and thus avoiding over-fitting.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**al3xandr3**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.