What your choice of statistics software says about you

January 3, 2013
By

(This article was first published on Revolutions, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

Sean Taylor, a PhD candidate in Information Systems at NYU’s Stern School of Business, describes the "Statistics Software Signal" and his observation that some software packages are correlated with bad science. While, I don't agree with all of his points (some fine analyses have been done with Stata, for example), I thought this was an interesting take on the R language:

When operating software doesn’t require a lot of training, users of that software are likely to be poorly trained. This is an adverse selection issue. Researchers who care about statistics enough should have gravitated toward R at some point.  I also trust results produced using R, not because it is better software, but because it is difficult to learn.  The software is not causing you to be a better scientist, but better scientists will be using it.

You can also read his list a of what your choice of statistical software pacakge (SAS, SPSS, Matlab, Julia and more) says about you, at the link below.

decomposition: The Statistics Software Signal

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on his blog: Revolutions.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...



If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.