Some time ago, I had an ineloquent and less-than-cordial online discussion with a commenter on this site, partially about how statisticians define the term “parameter”. This post is just to quote a relevant passage from “Bootstrap Methods and Their Application”, by Davison and Hinkley (1997), that better articulates a point I had made earlier.

2.1.1 Statistical Functions

Many simple statistics can be thought of in terms of properties of the EDF [empirical distribution function]. For example the sample average $\bar{y} = n^{-1} \sigma y_j$ is the mean of the EDF. More generally, the statistic of interest $t$ will be a symmetric function of $y_1,\ldots,y_n$, meaning that $t$ is unaffected by reordering the data. This implies that $t$ depends on the ordered values $y_{(1)} \leq \cdots \leq y_{(n)}$, or equivalently on the EDF $\hat{F}$. Often this can be expressed simply as $t = t(\hat{F})$, where $t(\cdot)$ is a *statistical function* – essentially just a mathematical expression of the algorithm for computing $t$ from $\hat{F}$. Such a statistical function is of central importance in the nonparametric case because it also defines the parameter of interest $\theta$ through the “algorithm” $\theta = t(F)$. This corresponds to the qualitative idea that $\theta$ is a characteristic of the population described by $F$…

*Related*

To

**leave a comment** for the author, please follow the link and comment on his blog:

** BioStatMatt » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates** about

R news and

tutorials on topics such as: visualization (

ggplot2,

Boxplots,

maps,

animation), programming (

RStudio,

Sweave,

LaTeX,

SQL,

Eclipse,

git,

hadoop,

Web Scraping) statistics (

regression,

PCA,

time series,

trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not

__subscribe for updates__ from the site? Choose your flavor:

e-mail,

twitter,

RSS, or

facebook...