I was once told that the reason that such a shape was so commonly used for aeroplane wings was merely that then one could study it mathemtically by just employing the Zhoukowski transformation. I hope that this is not true!

(R. Penrose, “The Road to Reality”, p.150)

Penrose here talks about a complex holomorphic mapping also known as the aerofoil transformation.

What you need is a cirlce in the complex plane, described by the complex function , that passes through the point . Then the transformation

transforms this circle into the cross section of an airplane wing.

Let’s look at this in R. Fortunately, R has some complex number arithmetic already built in. A suitable circle is constructed by

z <- complex(mod=2,argument=seq(0,2*pi,len=100))+(sqrt(0.5)+1i)

and the plot below (Fig. 8.15 in “Road to Reality”) is produced by

par(mfrow=c(1,2),mar=rep(3,4))
plot(z,type="l",asp=1,main="z-plane")
plot((z+1/z)/2,type="l",main="w-plane",asp=0.5)

Maybe at some point I also understand what Penrose means by

… the (idealized) airflow around [the wing] can be directly obtained from that around a ‘wing’ of circular cross-section

Is it true that a vector field on the surface of the circle directly transforms into the wind field around the wing? How do you transform a vector field by the above equation? Does the transformed wind field explain why the plane flies? Would be nice indeed, but this is another post.

*Related*

To

**leave a comment** for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

** sieste » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates** about

R news and

tutorials on topics such as:

Data science,

Big Data, R jobs, visualization (

ggplot2,

Boxplots,

maps,

animation), programming (

RStudio,

Sweave,

LaTeX,

SQL,

Eclipse,

git,

hadoop,

Web Scraping) statistics (

regression,

PCA,

time series,

trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not

__subscribe for updates__ from the site? Choose your flavor:

e-mail,

twitter,

RSS, or

facebook...