# An Example With accumulate()

**R on Data & The World**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

As with most useful (collections of) libraries, the tidyverse has a lot to offer. One interesting bit that I found recently was the `accumulate()`

function in the `purrr`

library, which allows you to apply a function over a succession of values in a vector. This post is a quick example of its use, using linear regression models.

The documentation gives a fairly brief description of the function:

`accumulate`

applies a function recursively over a list from the left, while`accumulate_right`

applies the function from the right. Unlike`reduce`

both functions keep the intermediate results.

The call to `accumulate`

requires a list or atomic vector and a function with two input variables, the output of the previous iterations and the next element in the vector (in that order). The obvious uses for this function would be cumulative sums or products, though base R already has the `cumsum()`

and `cumprod()`

functions. You could also take advantage of R’s ability to accept strings as formulas and then use `accumulate()`

to build a character vector of formulas, and then train a model on each one.

## Regression Example

For regression models, forward selection is a process for iteratively building the model by seeing which variable improves the model the most, adding it to the model, and repeating until some condition is met. This improvement is usually based on \(p\)-values or an error metric, but a (naive) idea, assuming you had all numeric (i.e., non-factor) variables, might be to add variables in decreasing order of absolute correlation. (I know that this isn’t a good idea for a number of reasons, and I’m leaving out the kind of exporatory analysis that should be done, but let’s see what happens.)

We’ll use the Boston dataset from the `MASS`

library, and try to predict the median housing value using several numeric columns (leaving out a couple variables that are indicators or only have a few discrete values). First we get the columns in order of largest to smallest correlation by magnitude:

> library(MASS) > library(tidyverse) > > data(Boston) > > cols_to_use <- c("crim", "zn", "indus", "nox", "age", "dis", "tax", "ptratio", "black", "lstat") > correlations <- cor(Boston[,c(cols_to_use, "medv")])[1:10,11] > strongest_to_least_corr <- names(sort(abs(correlations), decreasing = TRUE)) > strongest_to_least_corr [1] "lstat" "ptratio" "indus" "tax" "nox" "crim" "age" "zn" "black" "dis"

Then `accumulate()`

can help build the right side of the formula strings pretty easily:

> predictor_strings <- accumulate(strongest_to_least_corr, function(a,b){paste(a,b,sep=" + ")}) > model_strings <- paste("medv ~", predictor_strings) > model_strings [1] "medv ~ lstat" [2] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio" [3] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus" [4] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax" [5] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox" [6] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox + crim" [7] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox + crim + age" [8] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox + crim + age + zn" [9] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox + crim + age + zn + black" [10] "medv ~ lstat + ptratio + indus + tax + nox + crim + age + zn + black + dis"

And then we train a linear regression for each model string and look at the \(R^2\), both adjusted and not:

> unadj_R2 <- numeric(10) > adj_R2 <- numeric(10) > > for(i in 1:10){ > model <- lm(model_strings[i], data=Boston) > m <- summary(model) > unadj_R2[i] <- m$r.squared > adj_R2[i] <- m$adj.r.squared > } > > R2_data <- data.frame(NumPredictors=1:10, AdjR2=adj_R2, UnadjR2=unadj_R2) > ggplot(data=R2_data, aes(x=NumPredictors)) + geom_line(aes(y=UnadjR2, color="Unadjusted")) + > geom_line(aes(y=AdjR2, color="Adjusted")) + xlab("# of predictors") + ylab("R^2") + > theme(legend.title = element_blank()) + scale_x_continuous(breaks = seq(1, 10, by = 1))

As noted above, this isn’t really a good idea, based on the adjusted \(R^2\) decreasing from two to six predictors, so there are clearly issues with the approach. But this is the kind of situation where `accumulate()`

can provide much more concise code, which was the ultimate point.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**R on Data & The World**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.