# the strange occurrence of the one bump

[This article was first published on

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

**R – Xi'an's Og**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

**W**hen answering an X validated question on running an accept-reject algorithm for the Gamma distribution by using a mixture of Beta and drifted (bt 1) Exponential distributions, I came across the above glitch in the fit of my 10⁷ simulated sample to the target, apparently displaying a wrong proportion of simulations above (or below) one.

a=.9 g<-function(T){ x=rexp(T) v=rt(T,1)<0 x=c(1+x[v],exp(-x/a)[!v]) x[runif(T)<x^a/x/exp(x)/((x>1)*exp(1-x)+a*(x<1)*x^a/x)*a]}

It took me a while to spot the issue, namely that the output of

z=g(T) while(sum(!!z)<T)z=c(z,g(T)) z[1:T]

was favouring simulations from the drifted exponential by truncating. Permuting the elements of z before returning solved the issue (as shown below for a=½)!

To

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:**R – Xi'an's Og**.R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.