# Bangalore workshop [ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು ಕಾರ್ಯಾಗಾರ]

**Xi'an's Og » R**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

**S**econd day at the Indo-French Centre for Applied Mathematics and the workshop. Maybe not the most exciting day in terms of talks (as I missed the first two plenary sessions by (a) oversleeping and (b) running across the campus!). However I had a neat talk with another conference participant that led to [what I think are] interesting questions… (And a very good meal in a local restaurant as the guest house had not booked me for dinner!)

**T**o wit: given a target like

the simulation of λ can be demarginalised into the simulation of

where **z** is a latent (and artificial) variable. This means a Gibbs sampler simulating λ given z and z given λ can produce an outcome from the target (*). Interestingly, another completion is to consider that the z_{i}‘s are U(0,y_{i}) and to see the quantity

as an unbiased estimator of the target. What’s quite intriguing is that the quantity remains the same but with different motivations: (a) demarginalisation versus unbiasedness and (b) z_{i} Exp(λ) versus z_{i} U(0,y_{i}). The stationary is the same, as shown by the graph below, the core distributions are [formally] the same, … but the reasoning deeply differs.

**O**bviously, since unbiased estimators of the likelihood can be justified by auxiliary variable arguments, this is not in fine a big surprise. Still, I had not though of the analogy between demarginalisation and unbiased likelihood estimation previously.**H**ere are the R procedures if you are interested:

n=29 y=rexp(n) T=10^5 #MCMC.1 lam=rep(1,T) z=runif(n)*y for (t in 1:T){ lam[t]=rgamma(1,shap=2,rate=1+sum(z)) z=-log(1-runif(n)*(1-exp(-lam[t]*y)))/lam[t] } #MCMC.2 fam=rep(1,T) z=runif(n)*y for (t in 1:T){ fam[t]=rgamma(1,shap=2,rate=1+sum(z)) z=runif(n)*y }

Filed under: pictures, R, Running, Statistics, Travel, University life, Wines Tagged: auxiliary variable, Bangalore, demarginalisation, Gibbs sampler, IFCAM, Indian Institute of Science, unbiased estimation

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**Xi'an's Og » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.