# Down and Dirty Forecasting: Part 1

[This article was first published on

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

I wanted to see what I could do in a hurry using the commands found at Forecasting: Principles and Practice . I chose a simple enough data set of Wisconsin Unemployment from 1976 to the present (April 2013). I kept the last 12 months worth of data to test the accuracy of the models. The next blog post will include a multiple regression analysis. The analysis is lacking many important steps, particularly the ARIMA, but this is a down and dirty exercise.**OutLie..R**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

library(forecast) library(lmtest) library(caret) #State Unemployment seasonally adjusted #http://www.quandl.com/FRED-Federal-Reserve-Economic-Data/WIUR-Unemployment-Rate-in-Wisconsin #Using Quandl data, great little site wi<-read.csv('http://www.quandl.com/api/v1/datasets/FRED/WIUR.csv?&auth_token=gigXwpxd6Ex91cjgz1B7&trim_start=1976-01-01&trim_end=2013-04-01&sort_order=desc', colClasses=c('Date'='Date')) #some minor clean up colnames(wi)<-c('date', 'rate') wi$date<-as.Date(wi$date) summary(wi) #base data, 1-436, test data 437-448 wi.b<-wi[1:436,] wi.p<-wi[437:448,] wi.ts<-ts(wi.b$rate, start=c(1976, 1), frequency=12) wi.p.ts<-ts(wi.p$rate, start=c(2012, 5), frequency=12) plot.ts(wi.ts) #Lets test some models mean<-meanf(wi.ts, 12) naive<-rwf(wi.ts, 12) s.naive<-snaive(wi.ts, 12) drift<-rwf(wi.ts, 12, drift=T) #linear fit m1<-tslm(wi.ts~trend) m2<-tslm(wi.ts~trend+season) #checking for autocorrelation res1 <- residuals(m1) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(res1, ylab="Residuals",xlab="Year") Acf(res1, main="ACF of residuals") res2 <- residuals(m2) par(mfrow=c(1,2)) plot(res2, ylab="Residuals",xlab="Year") Acf(res2, main="ACF of residuals") par(mfrow=c(1,1)) #Durbin-Watson Test dwtest(m1, alt="two.sided") dwtest(m2, alt="two.sided") #yep autocorrelation city! No surprize here, due to the nature of unemployment #STL ETS Decomposition m3<-stl(wi.ts, s.window='periodic') plot(m3) m4<-ets(wi.ts, model='ZZZ') plot(m4) #ARIMA m5<-auto.arima(wi.ts) plot(forecast(m5, h=12)) #neural networks m6<-nnetar(wi.ts) m6 plot(forecast(m6, h=12)) #Testing for accuracy the first 4 models a1<-accuracy(mean, wi.p.ts) a2<-accuracy(naive, wi.p.ts) a3<-accuracy(s.naive, wi.p.ts) a4<-accuracy(drift, wi.p.ts) a.table<-rbind(a1, a2, a3, a4) #Creating the forecast and accuracy for the next 6 models f1<-forecast(m1, h=12) f2<-forecast(m2, h=12) f3<-forecast(m3, h=12) f4<-forecast(m4, h=12) f5<-forecast(m5, h=12) f6<-forecast(m6, h=12) a5<-accuracy(f1, wi.p.ts) a6<-accuracy(f2, wi.p.ts) a7<-accuracy(f3, wi.p.ts) a8<-accuracy(f4, wi.p.ts) a9<-accuracy(f5, wi.p.ts) a10<-accuracy(f6, wi.p.ts) #Combining into a table with row names a.table<-rbind(a.table, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10) row.names(a.table)<-c('Mean', 'Naive', 'S. Naive', 'Drift', 'Lm~Trend', 'Lm~Trend+Sea', 'STL', 'ETS', 'ARIMA', 'Neuro') #make into a data frame so the best model is first, according to MAPE a.table<-as.data.frame(a.table) a.table<-a.table[order(a.table$MAPE),] a.table

Results so far: Looks like the mean like forecasts are doing the best, the fancy models are not doing very well.

To

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:**OutLie..R**.R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.