Adjust branch lengths with node ages: comparison of two methods

[This article was first published on Recology, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Here is an approach for comparing two methods of adjusting branch lengths on trees: bladj in the program Phylocom and a fxn written by Gene Hunt at the Smithsonian.

Get the code and example files here:
Get phylocom here:

The code uses as input a newick tree file and a text file of node ages.

# This is where the work happens... 
# Directory below needs to have at least three items:
#  1. phylocom executable for windows or mac
#  2. tree newick file
#  3. node ages file as required by phylocom, see their manual
# Output: trees_out is a list of three trees, the original, bladj, and Gene Hunt's method
# Also, within the function all three trees are written to file as PDFs
trees_out <- AdjBrLens("tree.txt", "nodeages.txt")
# plot trees of three methods together, 
# with nodes with age estimates labeled
layout(matrix(1:3, 1, 3))
nodelabels(trees_out[[1]]$node.label, cex = 0.6)
title("original tree")
nodelabels(trees_out[[2]]$node.label, cex = 0.6)
title("bladj method")
nodelabels(trees_out[[3]]$node.label, cex = 0.6)
title("gene hunt method, scalePhylo")

It is sort of hard to see the differences in the branch length changes here, but the individual output trees will reveal the differences better.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Recology. offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)