# R Environments for Gibbs Sampler State

**BioStatMatt » R**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

I recently decided to revisit some `R` code that implements a Gibbs sampler in an attempt to decrease the iteration time. My strategy was to implement the sampler state as an `R` environment rather than a list. The rationale was that passing an environment to and from functions would reduce the amount of duplication (memory copying). In my experiments, this results in only marginal improvement in iteration time. The following is just a toy example to illustrate.

Consider the logistic regression model

mathrm{logit}(pi_i) & = & beta x_i \

beta & sim & N(0, 10^{-3}),

end{array} ” />

where is a binary outcome, independently Bernoulli distributed with probability , is a scalar covariate, and the log odds is

*a priori*normal distributed with mean and precision .

For Gibbs sampling, it’s convenient to store and manupulate a model *state*. In the past, I had represented this in `R` with a list, for example

> logit <- function(e) log(e) - log(1-e) > expit <- function(l) exp(l) / (1+exp(l)) > # Simulate some data > n <- 1e3 > x <- runif(n) > y <- rbinom(n, 1, expit(5*x)) > iter <- 0 > itermax <- 1000 > state <- list(x=x, y=y, mu=0, tau=1e-3, beta=rep(0,itermax), iter=1)

Then, to perform a Gibbs update on beta, I would pass the old state to a function that would return the updated state. For example:

> Gibbs <- function(state) { + # Metropolis update + state$iter <- state$iter + 1 + + old_beta <- state$beta[state$iter-1] + old_probs <- expit(old_beta*state$x) + old_logp <- sum(log(ifelse(state$y,old_probs,1-old_probs))) + + dnorm(old_beta, state$mu, 1/sqrt(state$tau), log=TRUE) + + new_beta <- rnorm(1, old_beta) # Proposal + new_probs <- expit(new_beta*state$x) + new_logp <- sum(log(ifelse(state$y,new_probs,1-new_probs))) + + dnorm(new_beta, state$mu, 1/sqrt(state$tau), log=TRUE) + + if(new_logp - old_logp > log(runif(1))) + state$beta[state$iter] <- new_beta + else + state$beta[state$iter] <- old_beta + + return(state) + }

Hence, the Gibbs sampler would be used as follows

> system.time({ + while(state$iter < itermax) + state <- Gibbs(state) + }) user system elapsed 2.708 0.012 2.717 > summary(state$beta) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.000 4.414 4.564 4.515 4.792 5.417

Alternatively, the Gibbs sampler state may be stored and manipulated asan `R` environment. For example, to initialize the state:

> estate <- new.env() > assign("x", x, envir=estate) > assign("y", y, envir=estate) > assign("mu", 0, envir=estate) > assign("tau", 1e-3, envir=estate) > assign("beta", rep(0,itermax), envir=estate) > assign("iter", 1, envir=estate)

Then rewrite the Gibbs sampler function:

> GibbsExp <- expression({ + # Metropolis update + iter <- iter + 1 + + old_beta <- beta[iter-1] + old_probs <- expit(old_beta*x) + old_logp <- sum(log(ifelse(y,old_probs,1-old_probs))) + + dnorm(old_beta, mu, 1/sqrt(tau), log=TRUE) + + new_beta <- rnorm(1, old_beta) # Proposal + new_probs <- expit(new_beta*x) + new_logp <- sum(log(ifelse(y,new_probs,1-new_probs))) + + dnorm(new_beta, mu, 1/sqrt(tau), log=TRUE) + + if(new_logp - old_logp > log(runif(1))) + beta[iter] <- new_beta + else + beta[iter] <- old_beta + }) > > eGibbs <- function(estate) { + eval(GibbsExp, estate) + }

The Gibbs sampler is used in an almost identical manner:

> system.time({ + while(get("iter",envir=estate) < itermax) + eGibbs(estate) + }) user system elapsed 2.664 0.000 2.673 > summary(get("beta",envir=estate)) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.000 4.378 4.588 4.556 4.779 5.704

The percent decrease in iteration time is fairly constant for a variety of `n` and `maxiter` values. Presumably, this modest gain in speed results from less memory duplication. However, in some experiments with `tracemem` the story appears to be more complicated… For now, it doesn’t appear that utilizing environments is worth the trouble when the sampling algorithm is much slower than memory allocation.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**BioStatMatt » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.