**T**homas Clerc from Fribourg pointed out an embarassing typo in Chapter 8 of “*Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R*”, namely that I defined on page 247 the complex number as the squared root of *1* and not of *-1*! Not that this impacts much on the remainder of the book but still an embarassment!!!

**A**n inconsistent notation was uncovered by Bastien Boussau from Berkeley this time for the book *The Bayesian Choice.* In **Example 1.1.3**, on page 3, I consider an hypergeometric distribution, while in Appendix A, I denote hypergeometric distributions as , inverting the role of the population size and of the sample size. Sorry about that, inconsistencies in notations are alas occuring in my books… In case I have not mentioned it so far, Example 4.3.3 further involves a typo (detected by Cristiano Passerini from Pontecchio Marconi) again with the hypergeometric distribution ! The ratio should be

Filed under: Books, R, Statistics Tagged: complex numbers, hypergeometric distribution, Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R, The Bayesian Choice, typos

*Related*

To

**leave a comment** for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

** Xi'an's Og » R**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates** about

R news and

tutorials on topics such as:

Data science,

Big Data, R jobs, visualization (

ggplot2,

Boxplots,

maps,

animation), programming (

RStudio,

Sweave,

LaTeX,

SQL,

Eclipse,

git,

hadoop,

Web Scraping) statistics (

regression,

PCA,

time series,

trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not

__subscribe for updates__ from the site? Choose your flavor:

e-mail,

twitter,

RSS, or

facebook...

**Tags:** Books, complex numbers, hypergeometric distribution, Introducing Monte Carlo Methods with R, R, statistics, The Bayesian Choice, typos