Row names in data frames: beware of 1:nrow

March 21, 2012

(This article was first published on The stupidest thing... » R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

I spent some time puzzling over row names in data frames in R this morning. It seems that if you make the row names for a data frame, x, as 1:nrow(x), R will act as if you’d not assigned row names, and the names might get changed when you do rbind.

Here’s an illustration:

> x <- data.frame(id=1:3)
> y <- data.frame(id=4:6)
> rownames(x) <- 1:3
> rownames(y) <- LETTERS[4:6]
> rbind(x,y)
1  1
2  2
3  3
D  4
E  5
F  6
> rbind(y,x)
D  4
E  5
F  6
4  1
5  2
6  3

As you can see, if you give x the row names 1:3, these are treated as generic row numbers and could get changed following rbind if they end up in different rows. This doesn’t happen if x and y are matrices.

I often use row names as identifiers, so it seems I must be cautious to use something other than row numbers.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: The stupidest thing... » R. offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.


Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)