R featured in New York Times article
Today's New York Times carries a decent article
. Predictably, this lead to one (short)
, two (longest)
, three (short)
threads on the main R
One aspect merits further highlighting. The reporter asked whether R
would pose a threat to SAS:
"I think it addresses a niche market for high-end data analysts that want free, readily available code,"
said Anne H. Milley, director of technology product marketing at SAS. She adds, "We have customers who build
engines for aircraft. I am happy they are not using freeware when I get on a jet."
That's silly on so many levels. A concise and rather appropriate follow-up came in early from Frank Harrell,
a long-time S and R advocate:
This is great to see. It's interesting that SAS Institute feels that
non-peer-reviewed software with hidden implementations of analytic
methods that cannot be reproduced by others should be trusted when
building aircraft engines.
Achim already added this (and two more posts
from the aforementioned threads) to the fortunes package that collects such choice quotes.
R in Finance (the topic of our upcoming conference)
gets mentioned as well. Now, as editor of the Finance task view, I find that second half of
The financial services community has demonstrated a particular affinity for R;
dozens of packages exist for derivatives analysis alone.
to be a little off the mark. But that's minor as the article is broadly sympathetic, and mostly "gets
it" where it matters. Recommended.
offers daily e-mail updates
news and tutorials
on topics such as: visualization (ggplot2
), programming (RStudio
, Web Scraping
) statistics (regression
, time series
) and more...
If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates
from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail
, or facebook