(This article was first published on

**Ancient Eco**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)One of the most common ways people write for() loops is to create an empty results vector and then concatenate each result with the previous (and growing) results vector, like the following. (Note: wrapping an expression in the function system.time() executes the function and returns a summary of how long it took, in seconds.)

x <- c()

system.time(

for(i in 1:40000){

x<-c(x,i) #here i is combined with previous contents of x

}

)

user system elapsed

2.019 0.082 2.100

It is MUCH faster to create the results an empty vector of the correct size, and modify elements in place. This prevents R from having to move around an ever growing object in memory and is much faster. In short….it seems that what R is slow at is allocating memory for objects.

x<-numeric(40000) #empty numeric vector

system.time(

for(i in 1:40000){

x[i] <- i #changing value of particular element of x

}

)

user system elapsed

0.066 0.001 0.067

The second method is over 31 times faster on my machine.

PS. This post was inspired by Hadley Wickham’s much more technical and in-depth coverage of memory usage in R.

To

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:**Ancient Eco**.R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...