# Data wrangling operations with quantities

**r-spatial**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

This is the third blog post on
`quantities`

, an
R-Consortium funded project for quantity calculus with R. It is aimed at
providing integration of the ‘units’ and ‘errors’ packages for a
complete quantity calculus system for R vectors, matrices and arrays,
with automatic propagation, conversion, derivation and simplification of
magnitudes and uncertainties. This article investigates the
compatibility of common data wrangling operations with quantities. In
previous articles, we discussed a first working
prototype
and units and errors
parsing.

## Compatibility with different workflows

The bulk of this work can be found in a new vignette entitled *A Guide
to Working with
Quantities*.
There, you may find a comprehensive set of examples of the main data
wrangling operations (subsetting, ordering, transformations,
aggregations, joining and pivoting) in two distincts worflows: R base
and the *tidyverse*. Here, we intend to
provide a brief summary.

As we have discussed in previous articles, quantities are implemented as S3 objects with custom units and errors attributes. All the main operators that can be applied to vectors and arrays are properly defined so that they are forwarded to the attributes. This is important to preserve units (one unit for the entire vector/array), but is critical to correctly propagate errors (one error per vector/array element). If operations are not forwarded, object corruption occurs.

### R base

Data wrangling operations on data frames map to R functions as follows:

- Row subsetting:
`[`

or`subset`

. - Row ordering:
`[`

with`order`

. - Column transformation:
`within`

or`transform`

. - Row aggregation:
`aggregate`

. - Column joining:
`merge`

. - (Un)pivoting:
`reshape`

.

R base functions make intensive use of the `[`

generic. Therefore, as
expected, all the operations work correctly with units and errors
metadata. The only drawback is that aggregations by default will drop
quantities metadata. The reason is that there is a family of functions
(not only `aggregate`

, but also `by`

and the `apply`

family) which holds
intermediate results in lists, and these are finally simplified by
calling `unlist`

.

There is no workaround for this default behaviour, because it is not
possible to define methods for *lists of something*. Fortunately, all
these functions support a parameter called `simplify`

(sometimes,
`SIMPLIFY`

) which, if set to `FALSE`

, avoids the `unlist`

call and
returns the results in a list. Then, a call to `do.call(c, ...)`

will
unlist quantities without losing attributes or classes.

### Tidyverse

Data wrangling operations on data frames map to tidyverse functions as follows:

- Row subsetting:
`dplyr::filter`

(and others). - Row ordering:
`dplyr::arrange`

. - Column transformation:
`dplyr::transmute`

and`dplyr::mutate`

. - Row aggregation:
`dplyr::summarise`

(and others) with`dplyr::group_by`

for observation grouping. - Column joining:
`dplyr::*_join`

family. - (Un)pivoting:
`tidyr::gather`

and`tidyr::spread`

.

The tidyverse handles quantities correctly for subsetting, ordering and
transformations. It fails to do so for aggregations (grouped operations
in general), column joining and (un)pivoting. Most of these
incompatibilities are due to the same internal grouping mechanism, which
is in C and prevents the R subsetting operator from being called (which
in turn calls the subsetting operator on the errors attribute).
Interestingly, those operations still work for units alone, except for
column gathering, which drops all classes and attributes. It seems
though that there are long-term plans in `dplyr`

for supporting
vectorised attributes (see
tidyverse/dplyr#2773
and
tidyverse/dplyr#3691).

### A note on `data.table`

*Currently* (v1.11.4) `data.table`

does not work well with vectorised
attributes. The underlying problem is similar to `dplyr`

’s issue, but
unfortunately it affects more operations, including row subsetting and
ordering. Only column transformation seems to work, and other operations
generate corrupted objects. This issue was reported on GitHub (see
Rdatatable/data.table#2948).

## Future directions of units and errors

A couple of weeks ago, I had the pleasure of visiting Edzer Pebesma at the Institute for Geoinformatics in Muenster, and we had a nice R-quantities summit.

R-quantities summit with @Enchufa2 : merging rigorous error and units propagation to enable quantity calculus for R vectors. Thanks to @RConsortium ! https://t.co/1dJAnZCyIM pic.twitter.com/Wp6fRrn3WQ

— Edzer Pebesma (@edzerpebesma) 13 de junio de 2018

We had a very productive discussion on the future
directions
of the `units`

and `errors`

packages. These are some of the ideas on the
table:

- As a follow-up to the previous
milestone,
we found interesting the idea of enhancing the
`readr`

package to allow third-party packages to provide new column types and parsers that would work transparently. There are other interesting use cases, such as reading spatial data. We registered the proposal in the`readr`

’s repository. - We discussed a recent
proposal by Bill
Denney (and had a most interesting chat with him) in which he
requests support for
*mixed units*in R vectors and arrays. Bill works with data from clinical studies and deals with a very specific format. I refer to the issue at hand (previous link and references therein) for specific examples and further discussion. Edzer already started to work on this, and there is a functional prototype in the`mixed`

branch on Github. - As a mid-term plan, we would also like to add support for other
propagation methods to the
`errors`

package. More specifically, instead of storing a single value and an associated error (and applying TSM), we plan to provide support for full samples. Operations would work directly on these samples, so that every kind of correlation would be captured.

## Next steps

The R-quantities project is coming to an end. The next and final
milestone will try to provide a proof-of-concept to wrap `lm`

methods,
where errors are used to define weights in the linear model and units
propagate to the regression coefficient estimates and residuals. We will
also complete the documentation with the prospect of a first release of
the `quantities`

package on CRAN.

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**r-spatial**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.