# Less than negative?

**The Praise of Insects**, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

An interesting thing that I found while doing the analysis for my previous post on the Canterbury earthquakes, was the difficulty of constraining figures less than a negative number. For example:

a<-seq(1, 10, 1)

b<-a[a>3 & a<7]

c<-seq(-1, -10, -1)

d<-c[c<-3 & c>-7]> a

[1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

> b

[1] 4 5 6

> c

[1] TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE

> d

[1] -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6

The boolean operator for selecting a range less than a negative number ends up being the same as the assignment operator. To get around this I simply define the function neg()

neg<-function(x) -x

c<-seq(-1, -10, -1)

d<-c[cneg(7)] > c

[1] -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10

> d

[1] -4 -5 -6

**leave a comment**for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog:

**The Praise of Insects**.

R-bloggers.com offers

**daily e-mail updates**about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.

Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.