Oscar awards: good actor versus good actress

May 2, 2011

(This article was first published on Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

I am not a big fan of those ceremonies, where some actors pretend that
they are extremely happy to be there, and then some win a trophy, some
don’t, and those who win start to cry, and those who did not get a
trophy try to pretend that they are not affected, etc. The other reason
is that, since I have several kids, I do not go to see the movies that
often (I mean apart from Shrek, Toy Story… Harry Potter is probably
the only movie I’ve seen with real
actors – or at least human

But I remember being surprised when I looked at the nominees in newspapers,

Actresses are beautiful and look young, while actors are more
experienced. So I have try to see how old were those who win an Oscar, as best actor (here)
or best supporting actor (there),
and best actress (here)
and best supporting actress (there).

names=c("actor","supp. actor","actress","supp. actress"))

On average, a best actress is
36 years old, while a best actor
is 44 years old.  Which is quite a difference… Perhaps because
it takes more time to an actor to be a good one ? Assuming that they start
acting at 18, it takes 18 more years for an actress to be recognized as
a good one (here the best one), and 26 for an actor. Or
perhaps it is simply because leading actresses have to look young…
The oldest actor who won an Oscar was Henry Fonda (at the age of 76)
and the oldest actress was Jessica Tendy (nearing 81). Tatum O’Neal
became the youngest person to win the best
supporting actress award
at the age of 10 (she was 8 when she
was acting). The youngest best actress was Marlee Matlin, 21. The
distribution was be seen below, with actors in blue, and actresses in red, best supporting actors in dotted
lines, and best actors in plain lines,


Note that the age of supporting actors is older that leading ones. E.g.
the average age for supporting actors winning an Oscar is 50, while it
is  44 for actors. Similarly, it is 40 for supporting actresses,
and 36 for actresses.

> mean(suppactor)
[1] 50.23762
> mean(actor)
[1] 44.29982
> mean(suppactress)
[1] 40.55766
> mean(actress)
[1] 36.39733

Here, I have to admit that I was surprised. I always thought that being a supporting actor was a first step before being a leading one. So winners of supporting awards should have been younger that winners of leading ones. But this is not the case.

And the dynamic here is rather stable, with actors, 

and actresses,

except that the age difference between supporting roles and leading roles have increased in the 80’s for actors, while it decreased in the 80’s for actresses.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Freakonometrics - Tag - R-english.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.


Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)