Site icon R-bloggers

CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

[This article was first published on Brian Callander, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

CIS Primer Question 3.3.2

Posted on 14 February, 2019 by Brian Tags: CISP chapter 3, solutions, lord's paradox, simpson's paradox Category: causal_inference_in_statistics_primer

Here are my solutions to question 3.3.2 of Causal Inference in Statistics: a Primer (CISP).

< !--more-->

Part a

The following DAG is a possible casual graph representing the situation. We wish to find the causal effect of the plan on weight gain. The weight gain \(W_g\) is defined as a linear function of the initial and final weights. From the graph we see that the plan chosen by the students is a function of their initial weight.

A casual diagram for Lord’s paradox

Part b

Since initial weight \(W_I\) is a confounder of plan and weight gain, the second statistician is correct to condition on initial weight.

Part c

The causal diagram here is essentially the same as in Simpson’s paradox. The debate is essentially the direction of the arrow between initial weight and plan.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Brian Callander.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.