[This article was first published on Yet Another Blog in Statistical Computing » S+/R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
After posting “Removing Records by Duplicate Values” yesterday, I had an interesting communication thread with my friend Jeffrey Allard tonight regarding how to code this in R, a combination of order() and duplicated() or sqldf().
Afterward, I did a simple efficiency comparison between two methods as below. The comparison result is pretty self-explanatory. In terms of “user time”, dedup1() is at least 10 times more efficient than dedup2().
> library(sqldf)
> df1 <- read.table("../data/credit_count.txt", header = TRUE, sep = ",")
> cat(nrow(df1), ncol(df1), '\n')
13444 14
> # DEDUP WITH ORDER() AND DUPLICATED()
> dedup1 <- function(n){
+ for (i in 1:n){
+ df12 <- df1[order(df1$MAJORDRG, df1$INCOME), ]
+ df13 <- df12[!duplicated(df12$MAJORDRG), ]
+ }
+ }
> # DEDUP WITH SQLDF()
> dedup2 <- function(n){
+ for (i in 1:n){
+ df22 <- sqldf("select * from df1 order by MAJORDRG, INCOME")
+ df23 <- sqldf("select a.* from df22 as a inner join (select MAJORDRG, min(rowid) as min_id from df22 group by MAJORDRG) as b on a.MAJORDRG = b.MAJORDRG and a.rowid = b.min_id")
+ }
+ }
> # RUN BOTH METHODS 100 TIMES AND COMPARE CPU TIMES
> system.time(dedup2(100))
user system elapsed
22.581 1.684 26.965
> system.time(dedup1(100))
user system elapsed
1.732 0.080 2.033
To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Yet Another Blog in Statistical Computing » S+/R.
R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.
