weird [lack of] control…

February 20, 2012

(This article was first published on Xi'an's Og » R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers)

When I ran

> test=NULL
> for (i in 1:10){
+   if (i%%2!=0){
+     test=c(test,i)
+     i=i+2}}
> test
[1] 1 3 5 7 9

I was expecting the same output as

> test=NULL
> i=1
> while (i test
[1] 1 5 9

So this means that the dummy index in R “for” loops cannot be tweaked that easily. I seem to remember doing this kind of (dirty) tricks with earlier versions… Now, Alessandra and Robin think this is a good thing that the for loop is robust against this kind of non-sense, so I may be a minority in complaining about this lack of control [for me, if not for for].

Filed under: R, University life Tagged: dummy variable, for loop, loops, R

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Xi'an's Og » R. offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials on topics such as: Data science, Big Data, R jobs, visualization (ggplot2, Boxplots, maps, animation), programming (RStudio, Sweave, LaTeX, SQL, Eclipse, git, hadoop, Web Scraping) statistics (regression, PCA, time series, trading) and more...

If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Tags: , , , ,

Comments are closed.


Mango solutions

plotly webpage

dominolab webpage

Zero Inflated Models and Generalized Linear Mixed Models with R

Quantide: statistical consulting and training




CRC R books series

Six Sigma Online Training

Contact us if you wish to help support R-bloggers, and place your banner here.

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)