Usage of R functions "table" & "ifelse" when NA’s exist

January 12, 2011
By

[This article was first published on Econometrics_Help, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

Most of the time I came across now and then in help posts questions regarding the mismatching total count of observations after employing the R functions “table” and “ifelse”. This usually creates frustration among fresh/part-time practitioners which ends up doubting the application and reverting back to their earlier tool.

However, this mismatching of total count happens only when you have NA’s in the data.

Thus, to always get the total count figures, we should make practice of use following options with respect to the R functions mentioned above:
table(varname1, varname2, useNA = c(“ifany”)) # in “table” usage of “useNA” option
ifelse(is.na(varname1) == T, ***, ifelse(varname1 > 100 & varname1 <= 110, 1, 0))
# in “ifelse” usage of “is.na” option

***– here you need to provide which value to be taken if variable has values of NA.

Happy R Programming.

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Econometrics_Help.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.



If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers

Sponsors

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)