In a nls star things might be different than the lm planet…

March 10, 2010
By

[This article was first published on Stats raving mad » R, and kindly contributed to R-bloggers]. (You can report issue about the content on this page here)
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.

The nls() function has a well documented (and discussed) different behavior compared to the lm()’s. Specifically you can’t just put an indexed column from a data frame as an input or output of the model.

> nls(data[,2] ~ c + expFct(data[,4],beta), data = time.data,
+ start = start.list)
Error in parse(text = x) : unexpected end of input in "~ "

The following will work, when we assign things as vectors.

> nls(y ~ c + expFct(x,beta), data = time.data,start = start.list)
#
# Formula: y ~ c + expFct(x,beta)
#
# Parameters:
#        Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
# c     3.7850419  0.0042017  900.83  < 2e-16 ***
# beta  0.0053321  0.0003733   14.28 1.31e-12 ***
# ---
# Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
#
# Residual standard error: 0.01463 on 22 degrees of freedom
#
# Number of iterations to convergence: 1
# Achieved convergence tolerance: 7.415e-06

To leave a comment for the author, please follow the link and comment on their blog: Stats raving mad » R.

R-bloggers.com offers daily e-mail updates about R news and tutorials about learning R and many other topics. Click here if you're looking to post or find an R/data-science job.
Want to share your content on R-bloggers? click here if you have a blog, or here if you don't.



If you got this far, why not subscribe for updates from the site? Choose your flavor: e-mail, twitter, RSS, or facebook...

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Search R-bloggers

Sponsors

Never miss an update!
Subscribe to R-bloggers to receive
e-mails with the latest R posts.
(You will not see this message again.)

Click here to close (This popup will not appear again)